Building an empire by touching lives!!
Several years ago I would have said NO!! Today banks are being a bit ugly on how they are reporting to credit bureaus. These servicers are showing modification documents in which it gives the servicer the right to report the mortgage as being modified from its original terms. This is an adverse statement for credit scoring.
Be careful when you modify. Check the terms for modifications and ask the servicer how they will report this. One servicer has a trial period of three reduced payments while the modification process is being reviewed. During that time the agreed payment is not being posted to the account. It shows then that you are in default even if you continued to make your payments. If approved the lender adds the negative to the principle balance. If you are not approved, the lender has the right to accelerate the loan.
Don't take these modifications lightly. I have always said that modifications are better than refinancing. Now I would say that if you plan to stay in your home for another ten years go ahead and modify but remember your credit score could go down. However the more payments you make on time the higher the score would go. If you do not plan to stay in your home then you need to refinance to keep your score high. If you do not qualify for refinancing then go ahead and modify anyway to keep your home affordable.
If you are in a hardship situation because of job loss, medical bills or other occurances, call your bank or servicer immediately. There are plans and options available to you in that servicers are getting new programs all the time. You could possibly qualify for one of them. Remember the housing crisis is not over yet. Hang in there.
You can go to my websites for more information. www.affordable-home-refinance.com or www.empiremortgagecolorado.com and let us help you.
Have a great and safe holiday and remember our Fallen Soldiers and their families this Memorial Day.
Let us show you how to save your home! Banks lose an average of $50,000 on homes that are foreclosed on. Believe it or not, they don't want to take your home. Over 50% of home owners do not ever contact their lender when financial problems make it hard to make their payments. Do not assume the victim mentality, you have options and your lender wants to help you.
Let us show you an easy process that will help save your home.
Visit www.EmpireMortgageColorado.com now, to learn how.
Also check out www.affordable-home-refinance.com Read the foreclosure section.
Hope this is helpful and have a great day!!
After all, the 10th Amendment states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
The Constitution is not a document that restrains the people, but restrains the Federal government. I believe that is an excellent statement. Obama has stated just the opposite. He has said that he finds it unfortunate that the Constitution contains the restrictions on Government that it does. Oh really?
Both Virginia and Idaho have voted to sue the Federal government over Obamacare. You must push your state to do the same. Obama cannot be trusted. He would make a good lawyer in that he twists issues so far as to confuse those in thinking that he is correct in what is agenda reports. Maybe impeachment is good!!Your request for additional information including my name, sex, age, date of birth, race, ethnicity, telephone number, relationship and housing tenure have absolutely nothing to do with apportioning direct taxes or determining the number of representatives in the House of Representatives, and therefore seem invasive and a violation of my privacy and in direct conflict with the U.S. Constitution.
Therefore, neither Congress nor the Census Bureau have the constitutional authority to make that information request a component of the enumeration outlined in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3.
In addition, I cannot be subject to a fine for basing my conduct on the Constitution because that document trumps laws passed by Congress.
Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F2d 946 (1973)
"... there can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of his exercise of constitutional rights."
Miller v. U.S., 230 F 489
"The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime."
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson, 154 U.S. 447, 479 (May 26, 1894)
Neither branch of the legislative department [House of Representatives or Senate], still less any merely administrative body [such as the Census Bureau], established by congress, possesses, or can be invested with, a general power of making inquiry into the private affairs of the citizen. Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U.S. 168, 190.
Boyd v. U.S., 116 U. S. 616, 630, 6 Sup. Ct. 524,―and it cannot be too often repeated,―
that the principles that embody the essence of constitutional liberty and security forbid all invasions on the part of government and it's employees of the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of his life.As said by Mr. Justice Field in Re Pacific Ry. Commission, 32 Fed. 241, 250, “of all the rights of the citizen, few are of greater importance or more essential to his peace and happiness than the right of personal security, and that involves, not merely protection of his person from assault, but exemption of his private affairs, books, and papers from inspection and scrutiny of others. Without the enjoyment of this right, all others would lose half their value."
Note: These United States Supreme Court case has never been overturned.
Your claim of "Failure to respond to the census carries a fine of up to $5,000, although that law is rarely enforced" appears to be in conflict with the STATUES AT LARGE and the U.S. Supreme Court.
Sec. 221. Refusal or neglect to answer questions; false answers
-STATUTE-
(a) Whoever, being over eighteen years of age, refuses or
willfully neglects, when requested by the Secretary, or by any
other authorized officer or employee of the Department of Commerce or bureau or agency thereof acting under the instructions of the Secretary or authorized officer, to answer, to the best of his knowledge, any of the questions on any schedule submitted to him in connection with any census or survey provided for by subchapters I, II, IV, and V of chapter 5 of this title, applying to himself or to the family to which he belongs or is related, or to the farm or farms of which he or his family is the occupant, shall be fined not more than $100.
(b) Whoever, when answering questions described in subsection (a)
of this section, and under the conditions or circumstances
described in such subsection, willfully gives any answer that is
false, shall be fined not more than $500.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, no person
shall be compelled to disclose information relative to his
religious beliefs or to membership in a religious body.
Maybe you misunderstood and got confused. Here is what it says about Commerce Department personnel who disclose your personal information:
Sec. 214. Wrongful disclosure of information
-STATUTE-
Whoever, being or having been an employee or staff member
referred to in subchapter II of chapter 1 of this title, having
taken and subscribed the oath of office, or having sworn to observe
the limitations imposed by section 9 of this title, or whoever,
being or having been a census liaison within the meaning of section 16 of this title, publishes or communicates any information, the disclosure of which is prohibited under the provisions of section 9 of this title, and which comes into his possession by reason of his being employed (or otherwise providing services) under the provisions of this title, shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
Respectfully,
A Citizen of the State of Arizona